Editor’s note: This is the first case for paid subscribers. Free subscribers will see a paywall.

A 29-year-old woman was seen by an ENT surgeon and scheduled for sinus surgery.

She was otherwise healthy.

Dr. S was her anesthesiologist.

General anesthesia was induced but LMA ventilations were challenging.

She was paralyzed with rocuronium and intubated.

Several minutes after the operation began, her blood pressure was undetectable and the pulse ox was not picking up any readings. Her heart rate was in the 70s.

She was given 500mcg of epinephrine.

Repeat blood pressure was 60/40.

All anesthetics were discontinued.

CPR was started and she was given 1mg epinephrine.

The surgery was halted briefly, but apparently the surgeon continued operating again during the code.

Become a better anesthesiologist by reviewing medical malpractice cases.

Free to sign up, paid options for those who want to read more.

While awaiting EMS, chest compressions continued in a disjointed fashion.

She was given multiple doses of epinephrine and atropine.

Pinky frothy fluid was produced from the ET tube.

EMS eventually arrived and she was taken to a nearby ED.

Despite ongoing attempts at resuscitation in the ED, the patient never had ROSC and was declared dead.

The patient’s husband filed a lawsuit against the anesthesiologist, his employer, and the surgery center.

The expert witness opinion is shown below.

The expert’s report references 4 different sets of documentation, each providing different time stamps and slightly different versions of the events:

  • Anesthesia Note

  • Anesthesia Record

  • Code Blue sheet

  • State Department of Health Report

Reduce the likelihood you get sued through consistent review of anesthesiology malpractice cases.

Paying subscribers get new cases every other week (CME available as well).

The defense hired their own expert.

They discussed the theory of anaphylactic shock and a possible airway obstruction.

Their opinion is shown below:

logo

Subscribe to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber to read the rest of this lawsuit.

Subscribe Now

Benefits of subscribing:

  • become a better anesthesiologist
  • get biweekly new cases straight to your inbox
  • avoid lawsuits by reading anesthesiology malpractice cases
  • improve your medicolegal expertise

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

fern fern1 year ago

Agree that this most likely an anaphylactic reaction and surgery should have stopped immediately after circulatory arrest was considered. In a setting with paper records and clocks that are not coordinated recorded times may vary by a few minutes. No mention of a serum triptase, not sure on utility given outcome. A learning point here is the call to EMS for transfer immediately when code is called. Even if patient would have ROSCed and stabilized. Probably prudent to transfer the patient for monitoring in the event of recurrence/recrudescence.

Avatar

Christopher Little1 year ago

I'd really like to know what the anesthesia record and the anesthesia note refer to exactly. If there was an EMR with automated vitals, it should be pretty easy to actually know when things happen. The comparison between the two different time settings, seems disingenuous to me.