Welcome to the first ever Anesthesiology Malpractice newsletter!

This project is a collaboration between MedMalReviewer and a board-certified anesthesiologist who practices full time.

We’ve put a lot of work into finding and writing these cases, and we hope you’ll enjoy them as much as we have.

There are 3 subscription tiers: free (one case per month), paid (new case every other week), and CME (all cases plus 12 hours CME credit per year).

A 27 year old male was dropped off alone in the ambulance bay of a trauma center via private car.

There was a gunshot wound to his right thigh. He was unresponsive, with a thready pulse.

Upon immediate evaluation he was intubated and MTP started.

He soon lost pulses.

The trauma surgeon performed an ED thoracotomy with clamping of the descending aorta, intracardiac epi, and internal cardiac massage.

ROSC was obtained.

With suspicion of continued bleeding into the thigh the patient was rushed to the OR.

In the OR exploration of the thigh revealed complete transection of the SFA and laceration of the SFV with around 2L of blood and hematoma.

The vasculature was successfully repaired and a fasciotomy of the RLE then performed.

The patient continued to receive aggressive resuscitation with fluids and blood products, and was on pressors throughout.

An ABG just prior to closure revealed a pH of 6.57.

During closure the patient went asystolic. The team was unable to achieve ROSC and the patient was pronounced dead in the OR.

Become a better anesthesiologist by reviewing malpractice cases.

Free and paid subscriptions options are available.

The family sued the hospital and the physicians who cared for the patient.

The patient’s brother underwent a deposition and had much to say about the hospital and his experience there

The primary anesthesiologist for the case also underwent a deposition. Here is an excerpt.

The defense hired an anesthesiology expert. Below is the opinion of that expert.

Reduce the likelihood you get sued through consistent review of anesthesiology malpractice cases

Paying subscribers get biweekly cases.

Outcome

The defense filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit which was not contested.

The case was dismissed.

MedMalReviewer Analysis

  1. I was surprised to see a lawsuit over a trauma case such as this one. Who would sue the doctors trying to save this man? It wasn’t until I read the brother’s deposition that it made sense. This occurred at an inner city urban hospital that does not have a great reputation. Then we have a lack of communication with the family. I can see how anger could develop. The brother made a comment how it was “just a wound to the leg..” and “how could that kill anyone?” The team who could speak with the family and give information is occupied in surgery, which is where they belong. I’ll take this case as a reminder that a lack of updates and poor communication turn into breeding grounds for litigation. In anesthesiology we are removed from the burden of supplying family updates and communication, but we are not removed from these cases, and we get pulled into litigation.

  2. Lack of board certification can be a liability. The plaintiff’s attorney’s goal is to make you look like the worst doctor ever. This distinction make it easy for them, and opens the hospital up to “vicarious liability”.

    Vicarious liability: when one party holds some responsibility for the unlawful or reckless actions of another

    The attorney can point to the hospital and claim that they are hiring unqualified doctors who are not boarded. This puts the hospital, the entity with the deepest pockets, on the hook. Some hospitals or practices require board certification after a certain number of years. This case is a perfect example of why many hospitals have this requirement.

  3. Further deposition questions for the anesthesiologist focused on the side effects of drugs that were used including cisatracurium and norepinephrine, and required the anesthesiologist to justify administering these meds. Any medication given may have to be justified. In a way reading this deposition felt like the back and forth of an oral boards examiner.

  4. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a pH that low. I’ll agree with the defense expert, this patient’s fate was determined in the back seat of the car.

If you find these cases interesting, would you consider forwarding this email to an anesthesiologist colleague?

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Dr DLOrNoBalls1 year ago

An interesting, if morbid, thought is that if the trauma team decided to call it without performing a thoracotomy, they may not have been pulled into this mess. They would've had time to explain to the patient's family after calling it that he had already suffered too much internal blood loss and was succumbing to hemorrhagic shock from the 2L blood loss in his leg. They might still have been sued, but I believe there would be a lower likelihood since the lack of communication and perception of callousness was probably one of the biggest catalysts driving the lawsuit.

They were essentially punished for trying their hardest to save the patient. Simply tragic for all parties involved.

Avatar

Miller 51 year ago

Agree. ED thoracotomy is heroic. Also +1 for username.

Avatar

Eric FunkAuthor1 year ago

Not a bad point. If he dies shortly after arrival it's easier to blame what happened before he got to the hospital. People think that once you make it to the OR some sort of magic happens that prevents death. Not always true.

Avatar

Destinee Rankin BSN, RN LNC1 year ago

I am an OR nurse who started in a level one trauma hospital and this was a great case to read! I would love to see the original initial complaint and opinion of the plaintiff expert for more context.

Avatar

Transfusion Physician1 year ago

Probably just my bias, but the fact that there such little discussion of blood product use is a missed opportunity for the plaintiff (if it was not done properly) or further evidence for the defense that this case was doomed. What year is this? Pre/post PROPPR? Pre/post the shift away from crystalloid as the first fluid in trauma resus?

With a GSW, 11 RBCs is very different from 5 RBCs, 5 Plasma and 1 SDP. I'm also not a fan of how much weight is being put into that one Hct. Is that POC or CBC? Was that the 1st one recorded? What had been given? What was trend? In massive trauma, any single Hct measurement can be hard to interpret. In fact, without more data, if I wanted to help the plantiff, I could theorize that with this degree of blood loss, getting him to a Hct of 30% means they were over transfusing (RBCs or in general) and citrate toxicity conributed to the acidosis along with hypocalcemia leading to the arrest after an otherwise successful repair of his wounds.

Avatar

MedMal Reviewer1 year ago

Sorry the comment section wasn't working earlier, it should be up and running now!